Snooth Talk: Showing results 33-40 of hundreds for easy drinking; Red

: Posted by RGermuska, Apr 27, 2007.; ... but there are only 40 items in the search results.

The term 'hundreds' would indicate to me at least 100+

? should read:

Showing results 33-40 of TENS for easy drinking; Red

? perhaps there are other pages, but I do not have the option to move past page 5 of search results, if extra pages do exist.

2031 3202: Reply by Philip James, Apr 27, 2007.; Rich - is what we do unclear? the idea behind it was, we already sort by relevancy and rating (snooth rank). why would a user want to page out past 50 results?

thats already the 50th best wine for that query.

let me know what you think?

67 695: Reply by gr, Apr 27, 2007.; If you say you've got 100s of results, SOMEBODY wants to see them, or at least believe that they exist.

text hidden at the bottom, "click for the dregs"?

1 10: Reply by RGermuska, Apr 28, 2007.; What was unclear to me was the SORTING. How are things being sorted, and do I have any control over how I sort the results.

From a usability perspective I think if it's made clear that ONLY the top 50 results will be returned and HOW they are sorted, then I reckon you probably hit the rule of catering to 80% of users.

However, there will still be people who'd be interested to see what's going on past 50 - especially if I'm a company trying to optimise my database of wines so that they get a high listing on snooth, I need to know quantatively how I'm doing, not just a binary top 50 or not...

2031 3202: Reply by Philip James, May 2, 2007.; we will add some sorting, but dont want to allow people to page out to the 1,000th result.

the sorting (snoothrank, price etc) should help people for now