In the past, Philip has reported on the counterfeit wine problem. Recently I read this article at Slate which in turn led me to read this much older article at the Wine Spectator .
It seems somewhat less pure of a forgery case than the story of Han Van Meegeren . The notorious art forger took a great deal of pride in his work and by all counts was a fantastic artist and painter. He managed to convince some of the most well-known art critics of his day of the authenticity of his forgeries. I say the fake wines are less pure mostly out of ignorance. Without a case study -- a person who has engaged in the act of producing counterfeit wine -- we really cannot know what the motive is. Do these producers take pride in the wines they put into expensive shells? Or is it merely a money making scheme?
On the subject of hoaxes, I find the Museum of Hoaxes to be an excellent read. I'm often amazed by what some people are able to pull off!
I wouldn't be surprised if I discovered that 5% of what I'd come across on a daily basis turned out to be some manner of hoax. How's that for a measured portion of cynicism!
Back to Categories
Search the Snooth ForumSearch
Top Contributors This Month
- 91 posts
- 73 posts
- 63 posts
Weekday Wines - Post Pictures of your SelectionsReplied
Bastille Day 2016--Special Whatcha Drinking Today editionReplied
Little Black Dress Pinot GrigoCellared
Little Black Dress Divalicious Pink Pinot Grigio (2014)Cellared
Henr Estate Pinot Noir Umpqua Valley Barrel SelectRated
What have you bought lately?Replied
Yellowtail Cabernet Sauvignon (2014)Reviewed
Karen Birmingham Sauvignon Blanc (2015)Reviewed
Bliss Chardonnay (2013)Reviewed