2008 Waterstone Merlot Napa Valley 14.5% $18
This shows lovely, soft aromatic notes with a hint of Red Hots on the back end. Leather and carob accent the black cherry and cherry pit fruit that extend across the refreshing finish. Shows really fine persistence to the fruit. 91pts Read The Full Review Here
Acid: Medium-High
Tannin: Medium-Low
Sweetness: Low
Oak: Medium-Low
Spicy Flavors: Medium-Low
Savory Flavors: Medium-Low
Fruity Flavors: Medium-High
Intensity of Flavors: Medium-High
Mouthfeel: Medium- to Light-Bodied
In this gallery
-
Top Merlot From $15 to $20
-
The Snooth Experiment
-
2008 Waterstone Merlot Napa Valley 14.5% $18
-
2009 Charles Krug Merlot Napa Valley 14.9% $20
-
2008 Rutherford Ranch Merlot 13.5% $18
-
2008 McConnell Estates Winery Wackman Ranch Merlot Cosumnes River $17
-
2008 Charles Krug Merlot Napa Valley 14.3% $19
-
2007 Mcconnell Estates Winery Wackman Ranch Merlot 13.7% $17
-
2010 Decoy Merlot Sonoma County 14.5% $23
-
2009 Seven Hills Columbia Valley Merlot 14.2% $24
-
2010 The Magnificent Wine Company The Original Mountain Merlot 13.5% $20
-
2009 Kendall-Jackson Merlot Vintners Reserve 13.5% $17
-
NV Hope Family Wines Candor Merlot Lot 3 14.5% $16
-
2007 Robert Mondavi Napa Valley Merlot 16% $20
-
2008 Chatom Vineyards Merlot Calaveras County 14.8% $20
-
2008 Penley Estate Gryphon Coonawarra Merlot $20
-
Want To Learn More?
Comments
Bravo on the simplified assessments. Not only are they more understandable, it is far quicker and clearer. The link to "full review" is a nice idea, but the link I followed brought me to a visually confusing page where the review was quite a ways down the page. Yes, I understand this is done to enable Snooth to please the wineries and generate more click through business for Snooth, but it is rather annoying. Put the full review in a cleaner simplified page and it ultimately will be more effective. Simply put, I doubt I will read any full reviews unless I am really interested in a wine, under a more readable format I would red most of them.
Oct 09, 2012 at 4:21 PM
I appreciate the effort here, but I think part of the romance of wine has to do with all the 'descriptives' that are included in the 'full review.' I think visitors to Snooth are looking for that level of details, as opposed to a few mentions of low/medium/high on a sliding scale. I actually don't read these reviews any longer, because I don't feel I get as much. That being said, I bypass them for the full review, so thanks for including that link. See what the crowd says and go from there I guess.
Oct 09, 2012 at 6:15 PM
Freak
Cheers to your honesty and integrity Greg!. Maybe I'll find some Merlot I like, thanks to you. Oh, and I'm expecting delivery of my new 150 (?) bottle cabinet this Thursday. I'm sure I have enough top shelf wines to fill it, but the inventory has to rotate, and I have little money. Thank you again for years of insight.
Oct 09, 2012 at 7:48 PM
I've recently tasted through some low priced 2009 Bordeaux, and find lots of nice fruit (along with bordelais structure of course) in wines that are high in Merlot from that vintage. A nice one in this price range is Chateau Marjosse ($18 in Ohio where I am), 80% merlot, so close enough for this category. A Lurton property, so the winemaking is solid, if not flamboyant. I think it would compare favorably with the reviews I see here (and I wonder why nothing from Bordeaux on the list?)
Oct 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Hawks-
Miller
Hi, Gregory. I like your experiment and the straight-forward language! If you decide to continue with this I'd like to suggest that you add typicity
Oct 10, 2012 at 8:35 PM
Add a Comment
Submit
Edit Confirm