NV Hope Family Wines Candor Merlot Lot 3 14.5% $16
Toasty flavors of black pepper and wood spice dominate the wine. Cocoa accents over dried fruit, plums and dates power through on the back end, culminating in a finish that is disjointed and a bit hot. 86pts Read The Full Review
Acid: Medium-Low
Tannin: Medium
Sweetness: Low
Oak: Medium
Spicy Flavors: Medium-Low
Savory Flavors: Medium-Low
Fruity Flavors: Medium
Intensity of Flavors: Medium-Low
Mouthfeel: Medium- to Full-Bodied
In this gallery
-
Top Merlot From $15 to $20
-
The Snooth Experiment
-
2008 Waterstone Merlot Napa Valley 14.5% $18
-
2009 Charles Krug Merlot Napa Valley 14.9% $20
-
2008 Rutherford Ranch Merlot 13.5% $18
-
2008 McConnell Estates Winery Wackman Ranch Merlot Cosumnes River $17
-
2008 Charles Krug Merlot Napa Valley 14.3% $19
-
2007 Mcconnell Estates Winery Wackman Ranch Merlot 13.7% $17
-
2010 Decoy Merlot Sonoma County 14.5% $23
-
2009 Seven Hills Columbia Valley Merlot 14.2% $24
-
2010 The Magnificent Wine Company The Original Mountain Merlot 13.5% $20
-
2009 Kendall-Jackson Merlot Vintners Reserve 13.5% $17
-
NV Hope Family Wines Candor Merlot Lot 3 14.5% $16
-
2007 Robert Mondavi Napa Valley Merlot 16% $20
-
2008 Chatom Vineyards Merlot Calaveras County 14.8% $20
-
2008 Penley Estate Gryphon Coonawarra Merlot $20
-
Want To Learn More?
Comments
Bravo on the simplified assessments. Not only are they more understandable, it is far quicker and clearer. The link to "full review" is a nice idea, but the link I followed brought me to a visually confusing page where the review was quite a ways down the page. Yes, I understand this is done to enable Snooth to please the wineries and generate more click through business for Snooth, but it is rather annoying. Put the full review in a cleaner simplified page and it ultimately will be more effective. Simply put, I doubt I will read any full reviews unless I am really interested in a wine, under a more readable format I would red most of them.
Oct 09, 2012 at 4:21 PM
I appreciate the effort here, but I think part of the romance of wine has to do with all the 'descriptives' that are included in the 'full review.' I think visitors to Snooth are looking for that level of details, as opposed to a few mentions of low/medium/high on a sliding scale. I actually don't read these reviews any longer, because I don't feel I get as much. That being said, I bypass them for the full review, so thanks for including that link. See what the crowd says and go from there I guess.
Oct 09, 2012 at 6:15 PM
Freak
Cheers to your honesty and integrity Greg!. Maybe I'll find some Merlot I like, thanks to you. Oh, and I'm expecting delivery of my new 150 (?) bottle cabinet this Thursday. I'm sure I have enough top shelf wines to fill it, but the inventory has to rotate, and I have little money. Thank you again for years of insight.
Oct 09, 2012 at 7:48 PM
I've recently tasted through some low priced 2009 Bordeaux, and find lots of nice fruit (along with bordelais structure of course) in wines that are high in Merlot from that vintage. A nice one in this price range is Chateau Marjosse ($18 in Ohio where I am), 80% merlot, so close enough for this category. A Lurton property, so the winemaking is solid, if not flamboyant. I think it would compare favorably with the reviews I see here (and I wonder why nothing from Bordeaux on the list?)
Oct 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Hawks-
Miller
Hi, Gregory. I like your experiment and the straight-forward language! If you decide to continue with this I'd like to suggest that you add typicity
Oct 10, 2012 at 8:35 PM
Add a Comment
Submit
Edit Confirm