Bordeaux takes the spotlight with regard to fame, price and longevity. Of course, it is always blended there. Napa was the first to have a go at the gold, winning the (in)famous 1976 Judgment of Paris tasting.
However, more and more, producers and consumers seem to be growing disillusioned with this bruiser. It takes over vineyards arguably better suited to local varieties and makes marketers swoon with its consumer magnetism. Does Cabernet Sauvignon really make the noblest red wines in the world, or do we simply think it does because we drink so much of it (because it is so widely planted…and because we can pronounce it)? This is a question each palate must determine separately. So, go forth, taste and ponder the wines of Cabernet Sauvignon!
Articles » Wine Varieties » Article
Comments
I can see this to have some true, I am a Cabernet lover and on the white wines side I had always prefer Sauvignon Blanc.
Cheers
Dec 04, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Very interesting article. Thank you.
Dec 04, 2012 at 6:20 PM
ore
What an enjoyable,concise and well written article. Thanks.
Dec 04, 2012 at 6:49 PM
der
Wow! Sauvignon Blanc. I would never have guessed.
Dec 04, 2012 at 11:13 PM
Love the article.
My question is: What did cabernet franc lack as far as not being able to be competitive with cabernet sauvignon?
Dec 12, 2012 at 8:55 PM
Canterbury-
MW
Zinfandel1, To be PC, it's not that CF "lacks" something but rather that it's just different. In fact, in the vineyard, CF offers some important pluses over CS. CF ripens more easily & is more resistant to inclement weather at harvest. However, CF has less color and less structure (despite its bright acidity) than CS. Also, CS produces more flavor power than CF in milder climates like Bordeaux. So, essentially, CS is better equipped for longer aging.
Dec 13, 2012 at 8:42 AM
Canterbury-
MW
Thanks to everyone for the kind comments! Glad you enjoyed this piece.
Dec 13, 2012 at 8:43 AM
Add a Comment
Submit
Edit Confirm